Swine-flu - The contradictions of an "epidemic"
Hans U. P. Tolzin
One of the
leading vaccine-critics in Germany
writing articles, giving seminars and lectures on vaccine related topics.
contradictions of an "epidemic"
Hans U. P. Tolzin at the “6.
Impfsymposium” (Vaccine conference in Stuttgart) , May 16.
2009. From Impfkritik.de)
epidemic under the name "Swine-flu" or "Mexican swine-flu" or "Mexican flu"
worries mankind at present and spreads fear and horror through the media. But
how “real” is the claimed danger realy? The contradictions in the official
comments of the world-health-authority WHO and the U.S.-epidemic-authority (CDC)
could hardly be bigger. Experience now the most important arguments for why
there is this alleged new and deadly epidemic only in the heads of the viral
strategists at the CDC and the WHO.
Scientific stand from 130 years ago
main-problem to me seems to be that almost all health-authorities world-wide are
on scientific stand, that is out-of-date already since about 130 years. The at
that time most important representatives of the infection-hypothesis, Louis
Pasteur and Robert Koch, still assumed that the human blood is sterile. The
bacteria, which one could observe in patient-samples with the new and always
improving light-microscopes, occurred exclusively in sick people according to
their opinion and came from outside, for example penetrated as "air-germs" into
that time, there were weighty voices among the researchers (for example Antoine
Béchamp), that reminded that with suitable light-microscopes can be determined
with careful and persevering observation, that bacteria and fungi change their
form and activity according to the milieu. And that the blood is not sterile at
all but that there is a whole lot of microorganisms in healthy as well as in
sick human beings.
Today we know
that there is constantly a multiple of bacteria in us than body-cells. One could
therefore claim that we don't consist of cells but of bacteria in the first
place - which since the times of Pasteur and Koch are lethal enemies of human
beings. And we have still not at all considered the essentially smaller viruses
on that occasion, whose exploration began only about 70 years ago with the help
of the electron microscope.
Fatal fixation on microbes
of the health-authorities on microbes still remain until today and is fatal in
its effects: With most illness-symptoms, first of all an infection-illness is
suspected, and a virus-test executed. If the test proves positive, this is
normally enough to immediately stop any further cause-search. But it is quiet
typical that these virus-tests frequently respond positively. According to such
a "positive results", the only salvation then is seen in the fight against these
microorganisms with the help of anti-bacterial or anti-viral medications.
simplify the diagnosis-procedure very much for the doctor and may represent a
not drying up source of ideas for new medications and money-streams for the
manufacturers, but of course this is not appropriate for the complex
correlations, that lead from illness to health with human beings.
infection-illnesses, as many holistic-doctors suspect, in reality be natural
events, for example a reaction of the body to strong stress-factors, then we
don’t have to be surprised, if said medications often lead to a decline of the
symptoms: On the basis of the poisoning, that they essentially represent, of
course the organism immediately must rearrange his list of priorities, and the
infection-activities - at least for the time being – diminish. Unfortunately, no
medication-study runs sufficiently long in order to be able to document the
long-term consequences with the necessary precision.
Blind belief in the germ-tests
germ-fixation therefore is the main-problem. The second problem is the blind
belief in the germ-tests. Whoever asks about their standardization, that means
for proof that a positively proceeded test means the presence of specific
illness-causing germs, will normally be confronted with mystification,
skepticism until real annoyance. So as you would have asked for proof that the
earth is no disk but a ball, or that a new day follows the night. This also
happened the Nobel laureate Dr Kary Mullis, for example, the inventor of the PCR-Tests,
which is increasingly applied as germ-proof, when he asked years ago for the
scientific bases for the proof of the Aids-virus through his procedure.
certified experts don't know how these tests are standardized. My years-long
investigations meanwhile yielded that practically they simply experiment so long
with sick people, where they assume an infection with a certain germ, until the
test - normally a so-called antibody-test or a gene-test (PCR) - reliably
indicates positive with these sick people. Since no counterchecks are done
normally, these tests however essentially only mean that certain symptoms are
accompanied with certain test-results. They don't say anything about the cause
of an illness. Purely nothing at all.
How it began - the two first cases
South-California with two children, to whom they as first assumed the infection
with a new flu-cause, determined gene-fractions have been found by means of PCR.
These children were not seriously ill and recovered already after a few days.
Either, the people didn't begin in their nearest surroundings until today
falling dead like the flies. Why therefore the whole excitement?
co-workers of the CDC, the U.S.-epidemic-authority, were a little bit confused
from the fact, that they had not succeeded with both children to determine the
exact subtype of the supposed influenza-virus. I consciously write "supposed",
because the PCR-tests in no direct way prove viruses, but rather DNA-fractions,
of which "one" believes, that they are typical for certain viruses.
Due to the
blind belief in the correctness and wholeness of the viral gene-data base that
serve as basis for the PCR-tests, the officials of the CDC looked further for
hints about which type of virus it was. According to the gene-data base THEN a
part of the found DNA belonged to a swine-flu-virus. The two sickened children,
however, neither had contact with pigs nor with each other. Their domiciles
roughly lie moreover 60 to 120 miles away from each other. The origin of the
allegedly new influenza-viruses could not be clarified therefore.
fitted well that in Mexico, not much further than 12 miles from the domiciles,
right now an increase of fatalities with cold-symptoms was observed. And so the
intellectual connection with Mexico was made for the first time.
cause of the "epidemic"
primarily healthy adults were concerned in the age between 20 and 40, not
children, weakened and seniors, as that would be typical and comprehensible with
a real flu-wave. Furthermore, the number of the fatalities was already
retrograde again. As this were not already enough, one could determine the
reputed late influenza-virus by means of PCR-gene-test only with a small
fraction (!) of the deceased.
cause of the, in reality not at all existing – epidemic - is to be essentially
sought in, that recently in the USA, as also in many other countries - the
so-called Influenza-Screening, the laboratory-backed supervision of the
influenza-viruses of the population, was intensified immensely. And the more
intensively one looks for something, the higher the likelihood, to find
something, or not?
U.S.-epidemic-authority CDC, where this "epidemic" has its origin, takes a
special-position. It represents something like the leading wolf under the
reference laboratories coordinated by the WHO world-wide. Regularly can be
observed that published conclusions from the CDC, that actually can only be pure
hypothesis because of the proof-situation, are taken over with the speed of the
information-age from the other WHO-laboratories, and in consequence also from
has the power to it (preferably leading co-workers of the CDC) establishes,
which DNA-fractures are associated with which type of virus and enters this
assignment into a central data bank, on which the health-authorities came to a
this key-person got its corresponding conclusion and how exactly that person
proved it, even the experts don't really know. Hardly anyone questions it.
That is not a
miracle either, because vaccination experts and virologists, that question this,
question their right of existence simultaneously - and their career. It’s the
same with the story of the ferryman, whose children starved, because he, in his
truthfulness and softness pointed to all of his passengers out that a beautiful
big bridge comes across immediately after the nearest river-inflection.
therefore wait that reason and a healthy common sense become generally accepted
within the community of the virologists someday, it could quite be that we wait
A self fulfilling prophecy
If one would
only look for it, so one could determine with some flu-patients surely that they
have a pimple or a birthmark or something similar on the left fanny-cheek and
conclude, that these skin-irregularities must be the cause of the illness.
now scans all people with breath-way-illnesses on this basis on
skin-irregularities of meant body-part world-wide, so it is absolutely not
avoidable to find a certain percentage. And already we have an interrelated
epidemic and desperately can begin to understand the intercontinental
infection-ways of the suspicion-cases and contact-persons.
This is like
a self fulfilling prophecy. And if you are astonished now, because the whole
thing essentially is completely ridiculous, I agree with you. Welcome to real